Tuesday, December 21, 2010

Top universities in Malaysia

The Malaysian government came up with the SETARA rating which "ranked" universities into 6 tiers , 1 – weak and 6 – Outstanding. It is interesting to note that some universities such as Taylor's University, Sunway University College are ranked in the same tier with University Malaya. This suggests that the oldest university in Malaysia either has quality as bad as private institutions, or private institutions such as Sunway have excellent quality as University Malaya, or the rating is, well, rubbish http://www.mqa.gov.my/setara09/result_en.cfm

What interest me the most is some of the universities included in the list. For example, Management and Science University is ranked in tier 5 as excellent. I never knew how good this university is, but one thing for sure, it does not belong in the same league with University Malaya, University Science Malaysia, Monash Malaysia, or even Sunway and Taylor's. What interest me the most is the lack of information being provided by the university website as well http://www.msu.edu.my/ I mean if you click on the link, you can't find any profiles of their academicians. You will not be able to see the lists of publications by their professors, how many of them hold PhD, how many of them are professors etc. Compare this with University Malaya and Multimedia University, where this information are shown on their websites.

The reason why I am interested to look at their profiles are due to the types of IT degrees being offered :

http://www.msu.edu.my/v6/fise/fise.php

They have forensic computing, IS auditing, mobile and wireless technology etc. These are quite specialized degrees and you will need capable people to develop and deliver these courses. What concern me is that does the university has such people? I am not sure as I can't see it from their website.

Another thing that bothers me is that when I click on their computer forensic programme link, the following information is being provided:

Offering of this program aims at:


 

a.to provide students with a full understanding of current and developing computer forensic technologies.

b.to facilitate students in the development of expertise in areas of direct and complementary relevance to gaining employment.

c.to encourage students to become autonomous learners

d.to provide students with an understanding of current computer forensic research issues.

e.to develop students' analytical, creative, problem-solving and evaluation skills.

f.to provide a platform for career development, innovation and/or postgraduate student.


 

I mean look at how poorly written are the objectives. "Understanding and developing computer forensic technologies"? " facilitate students in the development of expertise in areas of direct and complementary relevance to gaining employment."

The degrees proposed by MSU sounds fancy, but I am not sure what is the process involved in developing these courses. Is it developed by some lecturers in their faculties, whereby they just merged some subjects, add/adapt some subjects from books, websites etc?

As an IT researcher, I am really concern when university offers this sort of courses, as we are not sure are they being fair to the students, and are they really producing competent graduates in these specialized areas.

Sunday, December 19, 2010

World Class University with World Class Professors?

Sometimes in its efforts to build up a university's brand name, a university might starts to recruit "star" professors with great recognitions. However, how can you truly classify someone as being world class? I found this visiting senior lecturer in University Malaya.

http://umexpert.um.edu.my/cv_papar.php?id=4f6acf01c00fb6ed4a666ee996504553

Look at his achievements and recognitions. You might be impressed until you slap yourself and look at the actual awards and honours. They are mostly awarded by International Biographic Centre (IBC). I googled it and found this

"The Department of Commerce of the Government of Western Australia classified the Centre's offers as a scam and said:

The material promoting the International Biographical Centre creates a false impression about the credentials of the organisation. It also wrongly implies that the receiver of the letter has been picked through a special research process considering their work and qualifications".

Hmmm…being lazy, I tried not to search a list of all the impressive awards listed there. However, since this guy was given the best scientist award, he must have lots of publications. However, to search his name through web of science and scopus would greatly disadvantaged him, as his journals might not be listed in these databases. So I tried google scholar, and keyed in "Akcell Chiang Chii-Chung". How many papers? THREE. Well, try it yourself and you might even argued that it is only 1. Now, outstanding scientist who has 3 publications… HMMMMMMMMM……

I mean if you go through the list, there are hell lots of interesting awards. IBC Hall of Fame, Top 100 Scientists, etc. But what is interesting is that he only obtained his PhD in 2008. SO…. A phd grad in 2008, and a hall of famer in the field? You must be freaking Einstein.. even Einstein spent his early years working in a patent office before getting some recognitions later on.

NOW, is this what Prof. Ghauth Jasmon, VC of UM, has been promoting in terms of attracting the "Best" academics to join UM????


 

Malaysia’s H-index 1996 - 2008

This is an interesting data on Malaysia's H-index.

  

Country

Documents

Citable documents

Citations

Self-Citations

Citations per Document

H index

1

United States

4,318,928

4,052,816

75,766,251

35,474,244

18.08

1,048

2

United Kingdom

1,244,316

1,134,839

18,030,898

4,476,611

15.48

636

3

Japan

1,224,465

1,198,879

12,485,837

3,920,215

10.53

492

4

China

1,223,278

1,215,927

4,328,817

2,240,814

4.83

246

5

Germany

1,134,216

1,078,356

15,140,549

4,116,637

14.07

558

6

France

824,601

781,988

10,475,265

2,511,263

13.46

510

7

Canada

630,525

599,602

8,825,916

1,803,543

15.54

495

8

Italy

609,192

579,114

7,169,107

1,732,478

12.86

442

9

Spain

449,406

423,791

4,623,796

1,225,409

11.59

347

10

Russian Federation

405,499

402,701

1,856,149

577,757

4.61

245

11

Australia

401,930

376,906

4,986,938

1,101,340

14.05

380

12

India

393,536

376,276

2,107,271

729,613

6.09

206

13

Netherlands

347,423

329,111

5,634,691

1,001,727

17.68

430

14

South Korea

319,976

315,392

2,217,068

530,243

8.53

232

15

Sweden

250,129

240,309

4,008,063

708,092

16.95

381

16

Switzerland

247,655

234,947

4,391,015

643,764

19.44

432

17

Brazil

236,703

230,272

1,614,792

517,211

8.35

219

18

Taiwan

233,763

229,301

1,612,728

416,490

8.27

192

19

Poland

209,744

206,235

1,317,141

373,845

6.91

213

20

Belgium

188,493

179,544

2,596,630

416,166

15.09

334

21

Turkey

171,048

162,252

886,307

259,644

6.37

144

22

Israel

154,402

147,884

2,143,484

340,029

14.75

315

23

Austria

130,548

123,673

1,675,616

255,272

14.19

290

24

Denmark

129,742

123,928

2,186,505

341,907

18.04

314

25

Finland

124,445

121,124

1,800,702

322,469

15.79

281

26

Greece

109,440

104,470

902,351

180,820

9.74

185

27

Hong Kong

103,462

99,704

992,830

180,238

10.88

203

28

Mexico

96,625

94,410

700,094

160,114

8.3

165

29

Norway

94,617

90,777

1,236,892

215,909

14.55

243

30

Czech Republic

93,563

91,278

649,726

165,673

7.69

168

31

Singapore

82,159

79,715

702,120

109,807

9.91

175

32

New Zealand

80,299

75,790

925,791

160,983

12.91

212

33

Ukraine

74,325

73,902

253,451

75,267

3.46

106

34

Argentina

73,705

71,775

622,317

144,908

9.12

158

35

Portugal

72,826

70,910

630,969

137,362

10.49

165

36

Hungary

72,235

70,082

666,510

123,247

9.81

188

37

South Africa

71,731

67,560

582,693

133,165

8.97

163

38

Iran

68,401

66,918

261,974

109,888

6.57

83

39

Ireland

58,545

55,123

664,497

84,077

13.76

195

40

Egypt

47,420

46,731

239,623

55,012

5.62

95

41

Romania

42,320

41,858

186,021

45,957

5.24

97

42

Thailand

41,892

40,906

278,002

51,460

8.7

118

43

Chile

37,347

36,482

352,382

69,866

11.26

143

44

Slovakia

35,274

34,417

211,727

49,365

6.39

114

45

Croatia

31,748

30,897

145,119

36,722

5.14

95

46

Bulgaria

29,893

29,399

174,697

34,490

6.2

101

47

Slovenia

29,493

28,922

192,212

44,163

7.37

106

48

Malaysia

29,166

28,456

122,942

23,912

6.2

85

49

Saudi Arabia

26,763

25,588

134,758

19,320

5.35

87

50

Pakistan

24,564

23,485

89,584

26,902

4.53

73

51

Nigeria

20,341

19,860

70,415

17,874

4.36

60

52

Tunisia

17,785

17,249

67,659

16,222

5.15

61

53

Venezuela

17,580

17,168

115,854

19,204

7.14

100

54

Belarus

17,401

17,322

68,529

15,867

4

76

55

Morocco

15,952

15,477

80,545

16,051

5.48

69

56

Cuba

15,277

14,835

65,948

17,155

4.68

67

57

Colombia

14,754

14,345

97,872

15,017

8.79

88

58

Lithuania

12,834

12,650

72,953

16,624

7.32

83

59

Algeria

11,664

11,560

42,679

8,760

5.12

57

60

Jordan

10,751

10,599

46,485

8,143

5.2

53

61

Estonia

10,647

10,489

102,112

20,250

11.04

94

62

Kenya

10,026

9,560

105,629

19,244

11.8

97

63

Bangladesh

9,590

9,359

51,173

9,982

6.23

65

64

Indonesia

9,194

9,022

70,283

7,767

8.79

79

65

United Arab Emirates

8,908

8,542

41,981

5,608

5.9

58

66

Kuwait

8,780

8,590

48,357

8,133

5.91

58

67

Lebanon

7,499

6,971

45,043

5,116

7.78

65

68

Philippines

7,484

7,300

70,624

9,001

10.48

84

69

Viet Nam

7,359

7,210

57,816

8,107

9.74

78

70

Puerto Rico

6,770

6,604

80,088

6,770

13.04

93

71

Iceland

5,962

5,757

102,055

10,412

19.59

115

72

Armenia

5,610

5,548

35,844

6,783

6.64

72

73

Uruguay

5,580

5,406

57,473

8,872

11.95

80

74

Latvia

5,426

5,374

38,170

6,157

7.4

65

75

Serbia

5,280

5,157

6,428

1,977

2.55

20

76

Uzbekistan

4,727

4,697

15,532

3,286

3.35

40

77

Tanzania

4,549

4,378

42,860

7,221

11.01

68

78

Georgia

4,490

4,426

27,136

3,897

6.68

58

79

Peru

4,474

4,304

43,339

5,089

11.98

73

80

Sri Lanka

4,465

4,210

28,442

3,387

7.91

56

81

Cyprus

4,342

4,229

29,387

4,027

9.7

59

82

Cameroon

4,282

4,175

29,010

6,277

8.41

52

83

Oman

4,234

4,029

19,457

2,848

5.51

42

84

Ethiopia

4,218

4,137

27,878

5,646

7.79

52

85

Costa Rica

3,940

3,831

43,762

5,614

12.11

75

86

Azerbaijan

3,922

3,896

8,003

2,123

2.38

29

87

Zimbabwe

3,806

3,686

30,400

3,726

7.91

54

88

Uganda

3,694

3,462

39,935

6,514

13.53

69

89

Ghana

3,394

3,275

24,045

3,053

8.26

50

90

Kazakhstan

3,298

3,262

10,494

1,731

3.39

37

91

Nepal

3,278

2,968

19,730

2,838

7.63

51

92

Senegal

3,072

2,911

24,096

3,450

8.51

58

93

Moldova

3,020

2,997

14,064

3,160

4.8

42

94

Ecuador

2,427

2,331

21,403

2,887

10.63

58

95

Jamaica

2,294

2,147

16,345

2,256

8.09

43

96

Luxembourg

2,274

2,173

18,852

1,566

10.77

54

97

Macedonia

2,201

2,136

11,675

2,071

6.2

41

98

Côte d'Ivoire

2,176

2,089

17,856

2,148

9.02

50

99

Syrian Arab Republic

2,173

2,134

13,753

1,979

7.58

42

100

Qatar

2,162

2,065

6,621

675

3.91

28

Retrieved from: http://www.scimagojr.com.

    


 

At least Malaysia is not badly ranked as our football team. BUT, it also shows that our DPP should not questions Thailand universities' recognition, as we are way below them in terms of publications, and perhaps some manners as well.